Articles |
Articles PagesAdded Jul 18 2008Added Jul 11 2008Added Jul 10 2008Added Jul 09 2008Added Jul 07 2008Added Jul 02 2008Added Jun 25 2008Added Jun 08 2008Added May 31 2008Added May 26 2008Added May 25 2008Added May 13 2008Added Apr 28 2008Added Apr 21 2008Added Apr 09 2008Added Apr 04 2008Added Apr 02 2008Added Mar 31 2008Added Mar 20 2008Added Mar 19 2008Added Mar 03 2008Added Feb 27 2008Added Jan 31 2008Added Jan 30 2008Added Jan 16 2008Added Jan 07 2008Added Dec 30 2007Added Dec 15 2007Added Dec 13 2007Added Nov 28 2007Added Nov 20 2007Added Nov 08 2007Added Nov 04 2007Added Oct 27 2007Added Oct 19 2007Added Oct 10 2007Added Oct 07 2007Added Oct 05 2007Added Sep 23 2007Added Sep 21 2007Added Sep 10 2007Added Sep 03 2007Added Sep 01 2007Added Aug 22 2007Added Aug 19 2007Added Aug 17 2007Added Aug 15 2007Added Aug 14 2007Added Aug 08 2007Added Jul 12 2007Added Jul 08 2007Added Jun 29 2007Added Jun 11 2007Added May 30 2007Added May 29 2007Added May 26 2007
Added May 09 2007Added May 02 2007Added May 01 2007Added Apr 29 2007Added Apr 21 2007Added Apr 14 2007Added Apr 11 2007Added Apr 02 2007Added Mar 30 2007Added Mar 25 2007Added Mar 14 2007Added Mar 01 2007Added Feb 28 2007Added Feb 27 2007Added Feb 25 2007Added Feb 08 2007Added Feb 06 2007Added Feb 04 2007Added Jan 12 2007Added Jan 10 2007Added Jan 03 2007Added Dec 31 2006Added Dec 29 2006Added Dec 19 2006
Added Dec 14 2006Added Dec 07 2006Added Dec 05 2006Added Dec 03 2006Added Nov 29 2006Added Nov 27 2006
| Sylvia Browne on Exploring Psychic Powers Live!Sylvia Browne and James Randi give very different accounts of a show. Who is right? Sylvia Brown(e) in 1989 TV Special "Exploring Psychic Powers Live!" BackgroundOn June 7 1989, a TV special titled Exploring Psychic Powers Live! was shown on American television. Hosted by actor Bill Bixby, the show contained live tests of people with claimed paranormal abilities, all vying for a $100,000 prize if they passed their test. Part of that prize money was the then-$10,000 prize that James Randi was offering to anyone who could prove paranormal abilities under agreed-to conditions. The other $90,000 was provided by the show's producers. Appearing on the show to give a demonstration of psychic powers (but not competing for the prize) was a then-little-known Sylvia Brown (she had yet to add the "e" to her last name). In more recent years, Browne and Randi have told very different versions of what happened during Browne's segment of that show. This article will examine both of their versions of events, and then analyze the actual video of Brown(e)'s performance that night. Sylvia Browne's VersionOn the March 06 2001 broadcast of CNN's Larry King Live titled "Are Psychics Real" (CNN transcript here), Sylvia Browne appeared with psychic James Van Praagh against a panel of skeptics, including Leon Jaroff, whose article "Talking to the Dead" (critical mostly of John Edward) had recently appeared in Time Magazine. At one point in the show, Jaroff asked Browne about that 1989 show:
So, according to Browne, she was set up to fail, with the entire audience filled with Germans who could not speak English. James Randi's VersionIn his March 5 2004 Commentary (available here), James Randi (noted investigator of psychic and other paranormal claims) describes Browne's appearance on that show quite differently. Within a section of the commentary titled "Sylvia Browne is a Liar" (Randi is not known for pulling his punches), Randi talks about Browne's statements on Larry King Live, and gives a very different account of events:
According to Randi, all the people Browne spoke to in that audience spoke fluent English except for one German gentleman who did speak English. What Really HappenedFortunately, the actual video of Browne's appearance on that show has recently been made available (YouTube version available here), allowing us to see just what happened that evening. Here is a complete transcript of the video, interspersed with my remarks about Browne's performance. Introduction Bill Bixby introducing Brown
This is a classic "out" used by cold-readers (cold reading is a method used to create an illusion of psychic powers). By saying this, Brown(e) insures that, no matter how wrong she is in a reading, she can simply say "Well, this is something which has yet to happen." Reading: Woman #1 Woman #1
The woman did not seem particularly enthusiastic about the reading, and seemed to speak fluent English without a trace of a foreign accent. Reading: Woman #2 Woman #2
Note that Browne, totally failing in her reading, did indeed use the "in the future" out which she had prepared for herself. And again, this woman also seemed to speak fluent English without a trace of a foreign accent. Man #1 Reading: Man #1
Here then is the German gentleman Randi mentioned in his commentary. He seemed to speak reasonable English, but could not validate anything Browne said, since it was all future-related. Reading: Woman #3 Woman #3
Once again, fluent English, no hint of a foreign accent. Note how Brown starts off in the present tense ("Who is Kathy"), and when that fails to get a response, once again takes the "in the future" out ("she's going to be in school with you"). Also, when her "therapy work" guess gets no response, she immediately broadens it greatly ("you're going to be dealing with people that have to do with therapy. In other words, advising people, helping people, talking to people."). When that still gets no response, she moves on. Reading: Man #2 Brown talking to Man #2
Again, no hint of an accent, speaks English just fine. And when Browne's "show business" guess bombs, she turns it into a joke. Closing Brown wrapping up the segment
Brown's whole closing statement makes little sense, and does not sound like something spoken by an English major, let alone someone with a Master's Degree in English Literature. AnalysisBrowne's performance here as a "psychic" was pretty bad, to put it mildly. The only thing even close to a "hit" was when Woman #1 thought that someone she had recently met could possibly be the person Brown was describing. If the audience had been instructed - as Jaroff states - to only respond with "yes" or "no," this would definitely spoil a cold-reading act. Cold-readers depend on the person being read to provide them with the information which they then feed back as though they received it "psychically." Without that unwitting cooperation on the part of the person being read, a cold-reader will generally fall flat, as Browne did on this occasion. But this article is about analyzing her and Randi's accounts of the show. So, let's analyze the statements Browne made on the Larry King Live show regarding why she did so poorly:
Randi's version seems very much on the money. The only one of his statements which is not totally supported by the video was that only one out of the 140 audience members was German. Just from viewing the video, there is no way of knowing about those members of the audience with whom Browne did not speak. ConclusionSo, it is inescapable that Browne was 100% wrong when she described her participation in this show. But is she, as James Randi says, a liar? Browne seems to have a history of assuming that she can say whatever she wants about something, and that nobody will look it up to see if she is telling the truth or not. And unfortunately, many of her followers tend to take her statements at face value. And without the actual footage, it would have been impossible to determine who was telling the truth, Browne or Randi. Luckily, the video is now available, and it is quite obvious to me at least, that Sylvia Browne is indeed a liar. Update: May 29 2007James Randi, upon reading this article, sent me the following note:
Related LinksClicking on any of these links will load a separate browser window for viewing the linked page. StopSylviaBrowne.com is not responsible for the content of any of these linked pages.
|