A look at the claims, predictions and behavior of a media "psychic".
|
|
A look at the claims, predictions and behavior of a media "psychic".
|
Articles |
Articles PagesAdded Jul 18 2008Added Jul 11 2008Added Jul 10 2008Added Jul 09 2008Added Jul 07 2008Added Jul 02 2008Added Jun 25 2008Added Jun 08 2008Added May 31 2008Added May 26 2008Added May 25 2008Added May 13 2008Added Apr 28 2008Added Apr 21 2008Added Apr 09 2008Added Apr 04 2008Added Apr 02 2008Added Mar 31 2008Added Mar 20 2008Added Mar 19 2008Added Mar 03 2008Added Feb 27 2008Added Jan 31 2008Added Jan 30 2008Added Jan 16 2008Added Jan 07 2008Added Dec 30 2007Added Dec 15 2007Added Dec 13 2007Added Nov 28 2007Added Nov 20 2007Added Nov 08 2007Added Nov 04 2007Added Oct 27 2007Added Oct 19 2007Added Oct 10 2007Added Oct 07 2007Added Oct 05 2007Added Sep 23 2007Added Sep 21 2007Added Sep 10 2007Added Sep 03 2007Added Sep 01 2007Added Aug 22 2007Added Aug 19 2007Added Aug 17 2007Added Aug 15 2007Added Aug 14 2007Added Aug 08 2007Added Jul 12 2007Added Jul 08 2007Added Jun 29 2007Added Jun 11 2007Added May 30 2007Added May 29 2007Added May 26 2007
Added May 09 2007Added May 02 2007Added May 01 2007Added Apr 29 2007Added Apr 21 2007Added Apr 14 2007Added Apr 11 2007Added Apr 02 2007Added Mar 30 2007Added Mar 25 2007Added Mar 14 2007Added Mar 01 2007Added Feb 28 2007Added Feb 27 2007Added Feb 25 2007Added Feb 08 2007Added Feb 06 2007Added Feb 04 2007Added Jan 12 2007Added Jan 10 2007Added Jan 03 2007Added Dec 31 2006Added Dec 29 2006Added Dec 19 2006
Added Dec 14 2006Added Dec 07 2006Added Dec 05 2006Added Dec 03 2006Added Nov 29 2006Added Nov 27 2006
|
Montel: "Your Father is Not Your Father"Sylvia Browne tells a woman that she was the product of an affair. Published: Apr 04, 2008 
The woman hearing the "news." BackgroundOn the episode of the Montel Williams Show broadcast on May 16 2007, a woman in the audience asked Sylvia Browne a question, and received an answer which was probably not what she expected. The ReadingHere is a transcription of the segment, with my comments inserted: Video of the reading can be viewed here on YouTube.
The woman in the audience is good-looking, as is her daughter next to her, and has what could be described as a "gypsy" (or, more properly, "Roma") look about her. Stating that this woman's mother looked like the woman and her daughter is a safe bet. And what person would not agree that their own mother was beautiful?
Watching the video, this did not seem to be "hard" for Browne to tell this woman at all.
At this point, the woman sits quietly, and looks to be trying to take the information in. But Montel Williams then, as he frequently does, tries to make light of a bad situation.
The woman and her daughter. AnalysisIf Browne is - as I believe - a fraud, this was a horrible thing to invent and tell this woman. But, psychic or not, why would she tell someone something like this on national television? Why wouldn't she tell the woman to come talk to her after the show? After her initial reaction, the woman seemed to take it all rather well (and even if she hadn't, she had already signed the Psychic Show Participation Release, agreeing to hold Browne, Williams and the producers of the show blameless for any embarrassment or emotional distress resulting from her participation in the show). But, however she took it, how do the woman's siblings feel about their mother being called an adulterer on national television? Perhaps, to Browne, having a child as a product of an extramarital affair isn't a violation of wedding vows, but instead is, as she said "just one of those things." In her book Blessings From the Other Side (page 33, hardback edition), she says:
She seems to be implying here that her sons were born to two of her four husbands. However, according to her book Adventures of a Psychic, Paul Dufresne was born one and a half years into, and Christopher Dufresne was born seven years into, Browne's thirteen-year marriage to Gary Dufresne (see pages 66, 69, 85 and 87 of the paperback edition for the dates). If they have two different fathers, then at least one of them is the product of an extra-marital affair (I have been told that this fact is well-known in Browne's family, or I would not mention it here). Perhaps this is what makes her think it acceptable behavior to, with no evidence, accuse others of the same behavior, on national television. And worse, to accuse someone who is dead, and so cannot defend herself from the accusation. ConclusionIf this woman subsequently had DNA tests performed to determine the truth of this matter, I would like to hear about it, and I would place the information - whatever it is - here in this article if she wants me to. Related LinksClicking on any of these links will load a separate browser window for viewing the linked page. StopSylviaBrowne.com is not responsible for the content of any of these linked pages.
|
top of page