Articles |
Articles PagesAdded Jul 18 2008Added Jul 11 2008Added Jul 10 2008Added Jul 09 2008Added Jul 07 2008Added Jul 02 2008Added Jun 25 2008Added Jun 08 2008Added May 31 2008Added May 26 2008Added May 25 2008Added May 13 2008Added Apr 28 2008Added Apr 21 2008Added Apr 09 2008Added Apr 04 2008Added Apr 02 2008Added Mar 31 2008Added Mar 20 2008Added Mar 19 2008Added Mar 03 2008Added Feb 27 2008Added Jan 31 2008Added Jan 30 2008Added Jan 16 2008Added Jan 07 2008Added Dec 30 2007Added Dec 15 2007Added Dec 13 2007Added Nov 28 2007Added Nov 20 2007Added Nov 08 2007Added Nov 04 2007Added Oct 27 2007Added Oct 19 2007Added Oct 10 2007Added Oct 07 2007Added Oct 05 2007Added Sep 23 2007Added Sep 21 2007Added Sep 10 2007Added Sep 03 2007Added Sep 01 2007Added Aug 22 2007Added Aug 19 2007Added Aug 17 2007Added Aug 15 2007Added Aug 14 2007Added Aug 08 2007Added Jul 12 2007Added Jul 08 2007Added Jun 29 2007Added Jun 11 2007Added May 30 2007Added May 29 2007Added May 26 2007
Added May 09 2007Added May 02 2007Added May 01 2007Added Apr 29 2007Added Apr 21 2007Added Apr 14 2007Added Apr 11 2007Added Apr 02 2007Added Mar 30 2007Added Mar 25 2007Added Mar 14 2007Added Mar 01 2007Added Feb 28 2007Added Feb 27 2007Added Feb 25 2007Added Feb 08 2007Added Feb 06 2007Added Feb 04 2007Added Jan 12 2007Added Jan 10 2007Added Jan 03 2007Added Dec 31 2006Added Dec 29 2006Added Dec 19 2006
Added Dec 14 2006Added Dec 07 2006Added Dec 05 2006Added Dec 03 2006Added Nov 29 2006Added Nov 27 2006
|
Novus Spiritus - Followup to "Jewelry With a 'Quality Issue'"Is Sylvia Browne making a "good faith effort" to replace fake diamonds? You decide.
Non-descript notice to customers (I have drawn the red box around it). BackgroundOn April 21 2007, the article Novus Spiritus - Some Jewelry With a "Quality Issue" appeared on this site, detailing how Sylvia Browne and Novus Spiritus were dealing with (or not dealing with) the revelation that some of the "diamond" jewelry they had sold was made not with diamonds, but with cubic zirconia, an inexpensive "fake" diamond. This jewelry was sold on Browne's web site, as well as through the mail, at NS church services and at Sylvia Browne personal appearances. When questioned as to why there had been no notification about this in their newsletter or on their web site, Novus Spiritus board member Michael McClellan stated in an email (on March 21 2007) that a notice would be included in "our upcoming newsletter as well as in the jewelry section of the website." This article examines the notice which finally went up on their web site earlier this week. The Newsletter
May 2007 "Novus Connections" newsletter. As mentioned in the original article, after McClellan assured me that notice about the jewelry "quality issue" would be included in "our upcoming newsletter", both the April 2007 issue of the Novus Spiritus newsletter and the March/April 2007 issue of the Sylvia Browne newsletter went out with no such notice. I have since seen the May 2007 issue of the Novus Spiritus newsletter (see above), and again, the jewelry situation is not mentioned. This went out nearly two months after McClellan's assurance, and at least six months after McClellan says they first learned of the problem (others assert that McClellan has known for more than a year). The Web SiteSome time during the week of May 6 2007, the following unobtrusive notice was placed in the middle of the Sylvia's Spiritual Jewelry page on her web site:
Here are some excerpts from that letter:
The letter goes on to explain how to return the jewelry in question to ITC International, after which it will be examined and replaced if it is one of the pieces which is not up to ITC's "exacting expectations" (meaning it has fake diamonds instead of real ones). The letter continues (emphasis mine):
AnalysisThe undated "letter" from ITC is written as though it was intended to be sent out to members who had purchased the jewelry. Was it sent out? I don't know. Also, the fact that the letter is disingenuous about the problem makes it less likely that someone who reads the letter will act upon it. I believe that if it was honest and forthcoming about the actual problem - that there may in fact be no real diamonds on the jewelry - those who read the letter would be much more inclined to act on it, whether they received the letter in the mail, or were fortunate enough to happen upon it on the web site. The undated letter, apparently posted on Browne's web site in early May 2007, states that the offer to replace the "inferior quality" pieces expires on June 1 2007 - less than a month after the letter was posted. I do not believe this is sufficient time for the word to get out, people to read the notice, and act upon it. It should be noted that McClellan stated in an email to me dated March 21 2007:
I certainly hope this is true, but if so, it would have been appropriate for it to be mentioned on the web site. As of this writing, it is not. ConclusionFor Browne and company to bury this notice in non-descript text on the site's jewelry page - where it will only be seen if someone who has already bought jewelry happens to go back to that page, and then only if they read through the text to get to it - seems at best to be a half-hearted attempt at notifying their customers. The failure to include a notice about the problem in the Novus newsletter looks even worse. Combine that with the fact that the letter - posted on the site in May 2007 - says that the jewelry must be returned to ITC before June 1 2007, and to me, it shows an obvious disregard for those people who have paid Sylvia Browne way too much for phony diamonds. Related LinksClicking on any of these links will load a separate browser window for viewing the linked page. StopSylviaBrowne.com is not responsible for the content of any of these linked pages.
|